Viaducts Break Ranks Paul Klee Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Published on June 19, 2020 / Updated on September 27, 2026
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

A bridge divided into moving arches

The arches in Paul Klee’s Revolution des Viaductes no longer hold up a single roadway. They stand at different heights and angles against a mottled grey ground. Some seem to have feet. Their red, pink, orange and yellow interiors vary, while black outlines give them a shared form. The group can look like architecture, a crowd or a procession. Klee made this oil painting in 1937, when a word such as “revolution” carried urgent political weight. The image invites such a reading without depicting a named army, place or event.[1][2]

This site’s longstanding English title, Viaducts Break Ranks, describes the action of the arches. A closer translation of Klee’s title is Revolution of the Viaduct. The contrast between the two is useful: one stresses what can be seen, the other the artist’s provocative naming. The painting is held by the Hamburger Kunsthalle, whose record establishes its identity and later route into the collection.[1]

Explore the details of Viaducts Break Ranks

Select a numbered area to examine its detail at high resolution.

Numbered guide to 6 visual details in Viaducts Break Ranks 1 2 3 4 5 6
1

Small arches overlap near the top of the group

Detail 1: Small arches overlap near the top of the group in Viaducts Break Ranks
2

Openings at different levels interrupt the bridge rhythm

Detail 2: Openings at different levels interrupt the bridge rhythm in Viaducts Break Ranks
3

The left arches bend outward at their feet

Detail 3: The left arches bend outward at their feet in Viaducts Break Ranks
4

The large foreground arch has no roadway above it

Detail 4: The large foreground arch has no roadway above it in Viaducts Break Ranks
5

Warm red and orange forms crowd the right side

Detail 5: Warm red and orange forms crowd the right side in Viaducts Break Ranks
6

Signature and mottled grey field at lower right

Detail 6: Signature and mottled grey field at lower right in Viaducts Break Ranks

Contents

  1. Identifying the Hamburg painting
  2. How an arch learns to move
  3. Explore the details of Viaducts Break Ranks
  4. A 1937 work in a hostile climate
  5. Related works and the danger of a neat sequence
  6. From Klee to the Hamburger Kunsthalle
  7. Looking again

Identifying the Hamburg painting

The museum transcribes Klee’s title as Revolution des Viaductes, retaining its French-derived spelling. Other catalogues use Viaduktes or Viadukts. Those variants should not be taken as different paintings. Klee’s own annual number is 1937,153, with code R 13; the later catalogue raisonné gives continuous number 7089. The Hamburger Kunsthalle’s inventory number is HK-2899. The museum records a Klee signature at lower right and the title with his name on the stretcher reverse.[1]

The current museum object record describes oil on cotton, an image measuring 60 × 50 cm, with an 80 × 70 cm frame. The Jewish Museum’s written label for its 2026 New York exhibition specifies primed cotton. Its audio description instead says linen and gives a larger size, so the institution’s two explanations conflict; the owning museum’s object record is the sounder caption. Neither short description establishes the exact chemistry or application sequence of the ground. The visible dark contours and coloured areas should be discussed as painting, while a conservation file is sought for technical detail.[1][2]

The “Guggenheim Bridge” mentioned in some older accounts of this picture is not a documented bridge that Klee painted. The confusion appears to arise from a different Klee work in the Guggenheim collection: Brückenbogen treten aus der Reihe, an earlier 1937,111 composition of bridge arches in charcoal on cloth mounted on paper. The Guggenheim is the holding museum for that related work, not the name of a structure in the Hamburg picture. A relationship between studies and final painting is worth researching, but distinct supports, numbers and collections must remain distinct.[1][3]

How an arch learns to move

A viaduct works by repetition. One span follows another, carrying a continuous route across ground that might otherwise interrupt travel. Klee takes away the route. Each support now stands separately, and several bend at the base as if stepping away. The repeated inverted U shape keeps the group related; changes of height, width, position and colour give each member a different presence. The bridge has become an assembly of parts capable of movement.[1][4]

Painting: Hamburger Kunsthalle, HK-2899. Image: Anagoria's photograph via Wikimedia Commons, marked public domain there. The splash, numbered overview and details were resized or cropped from this photograph. Its colour and lighting are those of the photograph, not a calibrated record of the painting.

At first, the painting can still look solid. Thick dark lines enclose many of the forms, and the arches retain upright piers and flat tops. But they overlap in an irregular cluster rather than lining up to bear a load. A larger arch near the front competes with smaller ones behind it; openings at different levels pull the eye into and out of the group. Narrow yellow edging makes some black contours seem more emphatic. The grey background supplies no river, bank or road that could put the structure back to work. That absence is part of the animation: the arches no longer have to perform the task for which viaducts are built.[1][2]

Karin Schick, writing for the Hamburger Kunsthalle, begins with this reversal of architectural function. She leaves a productive question open: are the segments marching in ominous lockstep, or have differently coloured individuals joined in a revolt? Their similar shapes can suggest both conformity and collective action. The bends that look like feet sharpen the double possibility. A viewer can see a procession before deciding whether it is a threatening column, an exuberant departure or something between the two.[1]

Schick also notes that an earlier study included people and animals around the bridge. The final oil painting concentrates on the arches themselves. Art historian O. K. Werckmeister traces a group of five related 1937 works, including Tiere spielen Komödie (Animals Play Comedy) and Seltsame Jagd (Strange Hunt), which complicates a simple drawing-to-canvas story. What the finished painting shows plainly is a shift from a supported route to animated supports. Klee gives the bridge the energy of bodies without painting individual human faces or uniforms onto its members.[1][10]

Colour contributes to the change. Warm interiors vary from one arch to the next, while black outlines bind them as a recognisable type. That repeated difference is visible in the existing reproduction, though a small, colour-shifted JPG cannot establish exact pigments or all surface effects. It is enough to see that the group is not one flat-coloured mass. The visual tension between type and variation helps explain why its politics have been read in different ways.[1][2]

A 1937 work in a hostile climate

Klee’s historical circumstances make a political interpretation reasonable. The National Socialists removed him from his professorship at the Düsseldorf Academy in 1933, and he returned to Bern that December. He did not leave Germany in 1937 while making this painting. In the years that followed, the regime attacked and confiscated modern artworks, including Klee’s. The painting belongs to this time of displacement and repression, but a dated context alone cannot identify every arch as a specific soldier or prove that Klee pictured a particular Nazi spectacle.[5]

The Jewish Museum’s 2026 label presents a strong anti-fascist reading. It sees the individual, human-footed arches breaking out of line against the ordered displays of military parades. It relates their bright warm colours to nonconformity and contrasts them with Nazi uniform colours. This is a recent curator’s argument about Klee’s wit and the painting’s historical setting. It should be understood as an interpretation, not as an inscription by Klee saying that a red arch stands for one group and a yellow arch for another.[2]

Schick’s Hamburg account makes the ambiguity especially valuable. The same cluster can resemble soldiers keeping step or figures refusing to remain a fixed part of the bridge. The arches’ common shape allows the first thought; the differences among them and their apparent release from a single structure allow the second. A political account need not flatten the image into a poster with a key. Its refusal of a single visual command is one reason it could become a symbol of dissent.[1]

Art historian Frank Zöllner notes that since the 1950s this picture has often been understood as a confrontation with fascism. He suggests thinking more precisely about artistic and individual resistance. His remark is a later scholarly framing of the painting’s reception, not direct testimony to Klee’s 1937 private intention. A 1999 German collection of essays on art against war and fascism summarises Hans-Ernst Mittig’s contribution as moving beyond a simple direct-protest formula: in that reading, an effort to find footing again in Switzerland could itself provide a basis for resistance. The full Mittig chapter has not yet been accessible for close quotation, so its editors’ summary is the appropriate limit.[6][7]

Jürgen Glaesemer, in a recorded 1986 Guggenheim lecture, describes the arches as a caricature of mass movements. He connects the painting to Klee’s humour and irony as ways to consider reality without heroic pathos. The surviving transcript contains obvious speech-to-text mistakes, including a wrong reference to the First World War. Its object-specific interpretive point is useful when attributed, but its erroneous chronology should not be repeated. Glaesemer’s view broadens the question: the arches can be at once comical in their apparent feet and serious in what a crowd might do.[4]

Werckmeister’s 1987 analysis offers a sharper disagreement with the earlier view of an advancing totalitarian mob. He compares the repeated arches with monumental bridge and stadium architecture promoted under National Socialism. Such structures bind similar units into one permanent, collective form. In Klee’s picture, the top route is broken, the supports differ in size and colour, and they move through depth rather than holding a fixed line. Werckmeister therefore reads their individuality as a formal challenge to the idea of a homogeneous “people’s community.” This comparison is his historical interpretation; it does not identify one specific highway bridge as Klee’s model.[10]

His argument also connects the picture to Klee’s teaching about pictorial architecture. In the account Werckmeister cites, physical architecture tends toward static stability, while a painting can make the viewer’s position and the forms themselves seem to move. The arches turn that distinction into a joke with political force: components engineered to stand still walk away from their assignment. For Werckmeister, the title “revolution” is deliberately unsettled. In the Europe of 1937, the word was claimed by different political movements; he reads Klee’s image as a more cautious assertion of artistic independence than a declaration for a named party. Other viewers, including the Hamburg curator, still find a more ominous march plausible. The difference is part of the work’s documented reception.[1][10]

The painting has been compared with Picasso’s Guernica because both were made in 1937 and both have figured in accounts of art facing fascist violence. That comparison can clarify differences as well as similarities. Klee does not show a bombed town or a documented battle. His architectural fragments behave like figures, allowing satire and metaphor where Guernica stages bodily catastrophe. A shared year and broad political context do not make the works illustrations of the same event or prove a direct exchange of methods.[2][7]

The Guggenheim-held Brückenbogen treten aus der Reihe, usually translated Bridge Arches Break Ranks, is an important neighbour to the Hamburg painting. Its annual number 1937,111 places it earlier in Klee’s 1937 register than the oil painting 1937,153. It is a charcoal work on cloth mounted on paper, not the 60 × 50 cm oil on cotton. The titles both animate bridge arches, and the repeated motif makes comparison natural.[1][3]

Werckmeister’s documented sequence names Unter dem Viaduct (1937,77), the Guggenheim drawing (1937,111), Tiere spielen Komödie (1937,112), Seltsame Jagd (1937,152), and the Hamburg painting (1937,153). The two intervening titles warn against treating every member as a literal viaduct sketch. His note also reports a photograph Felix Klee took of an earlier state of the Hamburg painting. That state has been described as Abwanderung der Brückenbogen or Abwandernde Brückenbogen (“Departure of the Bridge Arches”), but Werckmeister says the available evidence does not establish whether Paul Klee first gave it that title and then changed it. The secure point is sustained work on the motif and a documented change within the final painting, not a perfectly settled chain of titles and intentions.[10]

This distinction also guards against a familiar mistake in art writing. The final canvas does not depict an actual bridge that was celebrated by Germans, and the museum name “Guggenheim” supplies no evidence for such a structure. A title about a viaduct can name a pictorial invention. Klee’s arches need only retain enough of a bridge’s shape to make their departure striking.[1][3]

From Klee to the Hamburger Kunsthalle

The Hamburger Kunsthalle’s researched provenance follows the painting from Klee, who held it from 1937 to 1940, to Lily Klee by inheritance. It then passed to the Paul-Klee-Gesellschaft in Bern in 1946. In April 1950, Oskar Reinhart of Winterthur held it, and the Hamburger Kunsthalle acquired it from him that month through a documented exchange involving nine paintings and one drawing. This chain matters because the picture did not enter Hamburg directly from Klee or remain at one institution since its creation.[1]

The museum marks its provenance as clarified and unproblematic while continuing object research. That assessment is part of its current record; it should not be padded with unrecorded motives or intermediate owners. Werckmeister’s 1987 catalogue reports that the picture was first publicly shown at Klee’s memorial exhibition in Bern, 9 November–8 December 1940, where it was offered for 1,500 Swiss francs. This is a documented historical asking price, not evidence of a sale. A 1957 MoMA catalogue already reproduced the Hamburg work under an English form of its title, showing its postwar international visibility. The Jewish Museum borrowed it for Paul Klee: Other Possible Worlds in New York from 20 March to 26 July 2026. That dated loan does not establish where it is hanging today; present display needs a fresh check at the time of release.[1][2][8][9][10]

Looking again

Begin with the outline of one arch and imagine reconnecting it to the next. The gaps, overlaps and footlike ends quickly defeat that repair. Look across the group by colour, then by size. The arches share a template but refuse identical placement. Finally ask what “revolution” changes: the position of bridge parts, the behaviour of a crowd, or the terms by which an image can be political. The painting supports these questions without turning a painting of moving architecture into a map of a real bridge or a documented parade.[1][2][4]

The Hamburg object is securely Revolution des Viaductes, 1937,153, oil on cotton, 60 × 50 cm, inventory HK-2899. Its related Guggenheim work is a separate charcoal composition. Klee’s forced departure from Düsseldorf and the Nazi attack on his art form essential context. The exact political target of each arch remains a matter of interpretation, best approached through the museum’s open question and the later, clearly dated readings. The arches are most alive where they seem both a group and individuals: parts of a common structure taking different steps.[1][2][3]

For related work, see Struck from the List for another object whose title invites political reading, the late-work overview for Klee’s circumstances after 1933, and the paintings index for the wider selection.

Explore selected works from Klee’s much larger oeuvre. Titles without a link have an authenticated catalogue identity but no reviewed article yet.

Artworks directory

217 artworks

NameDateMedium
A Gate1939Painting and mixed media
A Woman for Gods1938Watercolour and mixed media
Ab Ovo1917Watercolour and mixed media
Above Mountain Summit1917Drawing and mixed media
Abstract Trio1923Drawing and mixed media
Acrobats1915Watercolour and mixed media
Actor's Mask1924Painting and mixed media
Ad Marginem1930Drawing and mixed media
Ad Parnassum1932Painting and mixed media
Adventurer Ship1927Drawing and mixed media
Affected Place1922Drawing and mixed media
After a Sketch from Zurich1914Watercolour and mixed media
After Drawing1919Print
After The Floods1936Watercolour and mixed media
All Souls' Picture1921Print
Ancient Harmony1925Painting and mixed media
Angel Applicant1939Drawing and mixed media
Angel Serves the Desired1920Print
Angel, Still Female1939Painting and mixed media
Angelus Novus1920Drawing and mixed media
Animal Terror1926Painting and mixed media
Arab Song1932Painting and mixed media
Archangel1938Painting and mixed media
Architecture1923Painting and mixed media
Architecture of the Plain1923Drawing and mixed media
Around the Fish1926Painting and mixed media
Arrival of the Air Steamer1921Drawing and mixed media
Asiatic God1924Painting and mixed media
Astrological Fantasy Portrait1924Drawing and mixed media
Athlete's Head1932Watercolour and mixed media
Aufgehender Stern1931Painting and mixed media
Autumn Flower1922Painting and mixed media
Bad Band1920Drawing and mixed media
Baroque Centaur1939Painting and mixed media
Before the Blitz1923Drawing and mixed media
Before the Snow1929Drawing and mixed media
Besessenes Madchen1924Watercolour and mixed media
Bird Garden1924Print
Bird Wandering Off1926Watercolour and mixed media
Blossoms in the Night1930Watercolour and mixed media
Blue-Bird-Pumpkin1939Painting and mixed media
Boats in the Flood1937Painting and mixed media
Botanical Theatre1934Drawing and mixed media
Boy in Fancy Dress1931Watercolour and mixed media
Broken Key1938Print
Brother and Sister1930Watercolour and mixed media
But the Red Roof1935Painting and mixed media
C - C = Fisch1931Watercolour and mixed media
Cacti1912Painting and mixed media
Camel (in Rhythmic Landscape with Trees)1920Drawing and mixed media
Captive Pierrot1923Drawing and mixed media
Castle and Sun1928Drawing and mixed media
Cat and Bird1928Drawing and mixed media
Cathedrals1925Watercolour and mixed media
Chalice of the Heart1937Painting and mixed media
Characters in Yellow1937Painting and mixed media
Chosen Site1927Mixed media
Christmas Picture1923Drawing and mixed media
City of Towers1916Painting and mixed media
Clarification1932Painting and mixed media
Collection of Figurines1926Painting and mixed media
Colorful Architecture1917Painting and mixed media
Comedians' Handbill1938Print
Comic Opera Singer1927Painting and mixed media
Composition1939Painting and mixed media
Composition with Figures1915Drawing and mixed media
Composition with the Yellow Half-Moon and the Y1918Watercolour and mixed media
Conch–Still Life II1939Watercolour and mixed media
Cosmic Composition1919Painting and mixed media
Crystal Gradation1921Drawing and mixed media
Dance of the Grieving Child1922Painting and mixed media
Dancing Girl1940Painting and mixed media
Das Licht und Etliches1931Mixed media
Death and Fire1940Painting and mixed media
Death for the Idea1915Print
Demon as Pirate1926Watercolour and mixed media
Diana1931Painting and mixed media
Diavolo Player1923Drawing and mixed media
Die Kapelle1917Watercolour and mixed media
Die Vase1938Painting and mixed media
Doctor1930Drawing and mixed media
Dredger and Sailboat1931Watercolour and mixed media
Ein Tor1939Painting and mixed media
Ein Weib fur Gotter1938Mixed media
Embrace1939Watercolour and mixed media
Episode before an Arab Town1923Print
Equals Infinity1932Painting and mixed media
Eros1923Drawing and mixed media
Error on Green1930Watercolour and mixed media
Evening Figure1935Drawing and mixed media
Falling Bird1919Print
Fermata1932Watercolour and mixed media
Fire Clown1921Watercolour and mixed media
Fire Full Moon1933Watercolour and mixed media
Fire in the Evening1929Painting and mixed media
Fish in the Harbour1916Watercolour and mixed media
Fish Magic1925Watercolour and mixed media
Flock of Birds1917Drawing and mixed media
Flora on Sand1927Watercolour and mixed media
Flower Myth1918Print
Flower Stand with Watering Can and Bucket1910Watercolour and mixed media
Flowering Tree (Abstraction with Reference to a Flowering Tree)1925Painting and mixed media
Flowers in Pots1923Print
Flowers in Stone1939Painting and mixed media
Forest Witch1938Painting and mixed media
Fright of a Girl1922Drawing and mixed media
Fruits on Red1930Drawing and mixed media
Full Moon1919Mixed media
Föhn Wind in Franz Marc's Garden1915Watercolour and mixed media
Garden in St Germain, The European Quarter near Tunis1914Watercolour and mixed media
Ghost Chamber with the Tall Door (New Version)1925Print
Ghost of a Genius1922Drawing and mixed media
Girl in Mourning1939Painting and mixed media
Glance of a Landscape1926Watercolour and mixed media
Gluht Nach1939Drawing and mixed media
Golden Fish1925Watercolour and mixed media
Goldfish Wife1921Watercolour and mixed media
Green Plant, Blood, Louse1924Drawing and mixed media
Hafenbild1918Mixed media
Hammamet with Mosque1914Watercolour and mixed media
Harbour with Sailing Ships1937Painting and mixed media
Hauptweg und Nebenwege1929Painting and mixed media
Heavenly and Earthly Time1927Drawing and mixed media
Heroic Fiddling1938Painting and mixed media
Heroic Roses1938Painting and mixed media
Heroic Strokes of the Bow—Mixed media
Highway and Byways1929Drawing and mixed media
Houses near the Gravel Pit1913Watercolour and mixed media
Howling Dog1928Painting and mixed media
In the Current Six Thresholds1929Painting and mixed media
In the Style of Kairouan1914Drawing and mixed media
Individualized Altimetry of Stripes1930Painting and mixed media
Insula Dulcamara1938Print
Interior with the Clock1913Watercolour and mixed media
Irma Rossa the Animal Tamer1918Drawing and mixed media
Journey in Corsica1927Drawing and mixed media
Landscape with Bluebirds1919Watercolour and mixed media
Legend of the Nile1937Painting and mixed media
Lemon Harvest1937Watercolour and mixed media
Likeness in the Bower1930Watercolour and mixed media
Limits of Reason1927Painting and mixed media
Little Hope1938Watercolour and mixed media
Magdalena before the Conversion1938Drawing and mixed media
Mask of Fear1932Painting and mixed media
May Picture1925Painting and mixed media
Monument in a Cemetery1922Watercolour and mixed media
Monuments at G1929Watercolour and mixed media
Municipal Jewel1917Watercolour and mixed media
Mural from the Temple of Longing Thither1922Print
Nach der Uberschwemmung1936Watercolour and mixed media
New Harmony1936Painting and mixed media
New House in the Suburbs—Mixed media
Old Steamboat1922Drawing and mixed media
On the Edge1930Drawing and mixed media
Once Emerged from the Gray of Night1918Drawing and mixed media
One Who Understands1934Painting and mixed media
Oriental Pleasure Garden1925Painting and mixed media
Park of Idols1939Watercolour and mixed media
Passing by Red Pillars1928Watercolour and mixed media
Persian Nightingales1917Drawing and mixed media
Popular Wall Painting1922Painting and mixed media
Prestidigitator1927Watercolour and mixed media
Rainy Day1931Watercolour and mixed media
Red and White Domes1914Watercolour and mixed media
Red Balloon1922Drawing and mixed media
Redgreen and Violet-Yellow Rhythms1920Drawing and mixed media
Refuge1930Watercolour and mixed media
Rhythmic Rythmical1930Painting and mixed media
Saint of the Inner Light1921Print
Scaffolding of a New Building1930Painting and mixed media
Scholar in Dealing with Stars1926Watercolour and mixed media
Seated Woman1930Drawing and mixed media
Senecio1922Painting and mixed media
Separation in the Evening1922Drawing and mixed media
Sinbad the Sailor1923Drawing and mixed media
Skeptically Smiling—Mixed media
Small House in the Garden City1928Watercolour and mixed media
Small Portrait of a Girl in Yellow1925Painting and mixed media
Southern Gardens1919Watercolour and mixed media
Static-Dynamic Gradation1923Drawing and mixed media
Still Life1927Painting and mixed media
Still Life with Gladioli1932Watercolour and mixed media
Strange Garden1923Drawing and mixed media
Stricken City1936Painting and mixed media
Strong Dream1929Watercolour and mixed media
Struck from the List1933Drawing and mixed media
Structural I1924Drawing and mixed media
Sumpflegende1919Painting and mixed media
Temple Gardens1920Drawing and mixed media
The Arrow before the Target1921Drawing and mixed media
The Barbed Noose with the Mice1923Watercolour and mixed media
The Flora of the Heath1925Watercolour and mixed media
The Goldfish1925Watercolour and mixed media
The Hour Before One Night1940Painting and mixed media
The Man in Love1923Print
The Mask with the Flag1925Mixed media
The Pathos of Fertility1921Print
The Rhine at Duisburg1937Painting and mixed media
The Way to the Citadel1937Painting and mixed media
Three Houses and a Bridge1922Watercolour and mixed media
Tightrope Walker1923Print
Tomb in Three Parts1923Watercolour and mixed media
Tomcat's Turf1919Watercolour and mixed media
Tower in Orange and Green1922Drawing and mixed media
Tree and Architecture - Rhythms I1920Watercolour and mixed media
Tree and Architecture - Rhythms II1920Painting and mixed media
Tropical Dawn with the Owl1921Mixed media
Tropische Dammerung1921Painting and mixed media
Twittering Machine1922Drawing and mixed media
Variations (Progressive Motif)1927Watercolour and mixed media
Ventriloquist and Crier in the Moor1923Print
Viaducts Break Ranks1937Drawing and mixed media
Villa R1919Painting and mixed media
Village Carnival1926Painting and mixed media
Vor dem Blitz1923Drawing and mixed media
Wald-Hexen1938Painting and mixed media
Young Forest1925Drawing and mixed media

Discussion

The separate arches keep a bridge’s shared shape while moving at different angles and sizes.

The sources leave room to test both collective dissent and the unsettling image of a marching crowd.

Reader Insights

Close Looking

Which arch first looks as if it has taken a step?

Context

Does the group seem to move together or in different directions?

Open Question

Which original study could clarify the sequence of Klee’s bridge pictures?

Join the Conversation

Share what you see or a source that helps explain the work.

References

  1. Hamburger Kunsthalle, “Revolution des Viaductes,” object HK-2899, current indexed object, provenance and bibliography record (German; direct object view presented a challenge on 26 September 2026), View source.
  2. The Jewish Museum, New York, Paul Klee: Other Possible Worlds, written exhibition labels (2026), p. 57 of PDF, “Revolution of the Viaduct,” oil on primed cotton and curatorial political interpretation (English), View source.
  3. Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Arches of the Bridge Stepping Out of Line, separate collection object. Its 2008 exhibition caption, reproduced in contemporary coverage, gives charcoal on cloth mounted on paper and accession 48.1172.59; a published German work-register index gives Brückenbögen treten aus der Reihe, 1937,111 (P 11).
  4. Jürgen Glaesemer, “Paul Klee and German Romanticism,” 1986 Hilla Rebay lecture, Guggenheim Museum Archives transcript (English transcript published 2018; pp. 7–8 discuss the Hamburg painting as caricature; transcript contains errors), View source.
  5. Zentrum Paul Klee, biographical chronology and 1933 dismissal/return to Bern (English; German original cross-check), View source.
  6. Frank Zöllner, “Paul Klee, Hauptweg und Nebenwege, 1929,” Wallraf-Richartz-Jahrbuch 61 (2000), opening comparison with Revolution des Viaductes and its postwar readings (German; author-uploaded full text), View source.
  7. Gabriele Saure and Gisela Schirmer, introduction to Kunst gegen Krieg und Faschismus: 37 Werkmonografien (1999), p. 11 of publisher preview summarising Hans-Ernst Mittig’s chapter on this work (German; chapter itself remains unread), View source.
  8. The Museum of Modern Art, German Art of the Twentieth Century (1957), p. 127, entry/reproduction of the Hamburg painting under “Revolution of the Viaduct” (English; medium in this historical caption differs from the owning museum’s current record), View source.
  9. The Jewish Museum, “Paul Klee: Other Possible Worlds,” exhibition dates 20 March–26 July 2026 (English), View source.
  10. O. K. Werckmeister, “From Revolution to Exile,” in Carolyn Lanchner, ed., Paul Klee (The Museum of Modern Art, 1987), pp. 56–58 and notes 125–27 (English), discussion of the sequence, pictorial architecture, political readings and first exhibition. MoMA publication record; digitized text consulted.